Followers

Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label Melissa Manchester. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Melissa Manchester. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 08, 2022

Who Did It Better? Without You

Who Did It Better?
Without You


Paul McCartney once described this ballad as "the killer song of all time."

His description turned out to be a bit more apt than he imagined.

This one has a bit of story to it. Not only has it been recorded over180 times, it also ends quite tragically.

Without You is a song written by Pete Ham and Tom Evans, members of the group, Badfinger, It was first released on their 1970 album, No Dice, on the Beatles label, Apple Records. Each writer came up with a different section of the song. Ham wrote the first part about leaving his girlfriend, Beverly, to go into the studio to work on a song idea he had. It was originally titled, If It's Love. However, Ham wasn't satisfied with it. He felt it lacked a strong chorus, so continued to tinker with it. 

Meanwhile, Evans, lost in his own romantic turmoil, had written a song called I Can't Live, about his relationship with his future wife, Marianne.

The two got together and merged their songs - Ham's verses with Evan's chorus. Neither thought the song had much hit potential and the track ended up closing side one of their No Dice album. Now, due to a printing error on the album's label, the song would be credited to all four members of the band. This would lead to all sorts of trouble down the road, but we'll get to that later. In the end, Badfinger's version of the song was never released as a single in Europe or North America.

Best known for his hit version of the song Everybody's Talkin' and for composing One, a big hit for Three Dog Night, Harry Nilsson heard Badfinger's recording of Without You at a party and thought it was a Beatles' song. Upon learning it was not, he decided to cover it for his 1971 album, Nilsson Schmilsson. Released as a single by RCA in late fall of 1971, Nilsson's version first charted in the US in mid December. On February 19, 1972, it began a four-week run as the #1 song on Billboard's Hot 100. It would go on to top the Adult Contemporary chart for a solid five, ending the year as the #4 single of 1972. In the UK, beginning on March 11, 1972, it would remain #1 for five consecutive weeks, while repeating this same feat in Australia. It was also #1 for two weeks in both Ireland and New Zealand.

In 1973, the song was nominated for a Grammy as Record Of The Year. It didn't win, but Nilsson did take home a Grammy for Best Pop Vocal Performance, Male. 

Following Nilsson's runaway success with the song, into the breach, came versions from all sorts of established entertainers. Andy Williams, Shirley Bassey, Johnny Mathis and Vicki Carr, just to name a few, flooded the market with versions done in their own distinctive styles. Because these versions served as little more than album filler, we will not be considering them as part of today's competition. 

The end of 1976 found the Wilson sisters and their band Heart in the eye of a storm. Their 1975 debut album on Mushroom Records had, thanks to the hits Crazy On You and Magic Man, catapulted the group onto the international stage. The band was already in the studio in Vancouver, recording songs for a follow-up album. 

However, things quickly soured with the label due to a full-page ad in the December 30, 1976 issue of Rolling Stone magazine. Designed to resemble the cover of a salacious tabloid-style magazine, like the infamous National Enquirer, the ad showed the sisters bare-shouldered - just as they'd appeared on the Dreamboat Annie album cover - with the suggestive caption 'It Was Only Our First Time!' The ad fueled rumors that the sisters were lesbian lovers and the band abruptly ceased all recording activities for the label. At the time, only five incomplete recordings had been committed to tape.

A dispute over song royalty rates with Mushroom Records ensued, spurring Heart to sign with Portrait Records, a subsidiary of CBS Records, for the release of their second full-fledged album.  

However, Mushroom Records, which held a two-album contract with the group, claimed they had the legal right to release a second Heart album. Using the five unfinished studio recordings, as well as unreleased live tracks recorded in 1975, Mushroom had them remixed by the band's recording engineer without the involvement of any group members. Augmented with the B-side to the group's debut single, and including the band's version of Without You, Mushroom released the collection under the title, Magazine on April 22, 1978, just as the group was putting finishing touches on their Portrait debut, Little Queen.

About 50,000 copies of the original Magazine album were pressed and sold in stores in Los Angeles and Hollywood, Florida (the city where the albums were manufactured), while Arista Records distributed it throughout Europe. Heart sought an injunction, which was quickly granted, and all the unsold copies were recalled (and later destroyed.) 

In the end, the court upheld Heart's original contract with Mushroom Records, with the stipulation that the group be allowed to return to the studio and complete the album themselves. Rather than supply additional new material, the group decided to simply polish up what Mushroom had cobbled together and call it a day, with Ann Wilson providing new lead vocals to most the tracks. Work on the album began on March 6th, 1978 and was completed on the 9th, with the re-recorded, remixed, re-edited and re-sequenced album being released by Mushroom Records in April of 1978. The group's version of Without You was released as the second single from the album, but failed to chart.
 
Sporting a title song co-written with Elton John's songwriting partner, Bernie Taupin, and a cover photograph by glamor shot specialist George Hurrell, Arista Records had high hopes for the newly glammed-up Melissa Manchester and her ninth album for the label, 1980's For The Working Girl. However, despite strenuous promotion, the first single failed to chart, while the second single, a duet with Peabo Bryson, only did moderately well (Hot 100 #54, R&B chart #35 and A/C #25.) When the third single, Manchester's version of Without You failed to chart, all hopes for a significant comeback were squashed. 
 
In 1983, T. G. Sheppard had enjoyed a long string of #1 hits on Billboard's Country chart and his label decided to celebrate with the release a greatest hits album. To augment the hits, Sheppard recorded a version of Without You, which was then released as a single. His version would reach #12 on Billboard's Country chart. 

Just for the record... by the end of his career, Sheppard would notch an impressive 14 #1 Country hits!

In 1991, Air Supply would cover Without You for their The Earth Is... album, as their first album with the fledgling (and soon to fail) Giant Records. It would serve as the album's lead single, reaching #48 on Billboard's Adult Contemporary chart. 

Mariah Carey's version, which is based on Harry Nilsson's version rather than the Badfinger original, was released on January 24, 1994, as the third single from her album, Music Box. This just happened to be a bit over a week after Nilsson, who died of a heart attack, on 15 January 1994, had passed away.

Carey had heard Nilsson's version as a very young girl, but her decision to record the song was based on a chance hearing, "I heard that song in a restaurant and just knew it would be a huge international hit."  

Promoted as a double A-side with Never Forget You, her version of Without You reached #3 on Billboard's Hot 100, where it stayed for six weeks. In Canada, it peaked at #4. Overseas, the song debuted at #1 in the UK and remained there for a total of  four weeks. To this day, it remains her top international hit.

So, 180 cover versions of the song were recorded, which would mean a whole lot of money for the song's writers. 

Remember that little typo on the label of Badfinger's album, No Dice, back in 1970? The one where the song, Without You was credited to all four band members? Well, that led to all sorts of problems.

And, if history has taught us nothing else... do not mess with the credits of a songwriter's song.

Pete Ham, who had written the verses for the song, became clinically depressed due to on-going struggles over royalties, song credits, and issues with both the band's label and the other members of Badfinger. Despondent over what he saw as insurmountable problems, he, at the age of 27 years old, would take his own life on April 24, 1975.

Tom Evans, who wrote the chorus, was equally upset. Legal disputes over songwriting royalties had consumed his life, and after an argument with bandmate, Joey Mulland over the royalties for the song, Evans hanged himself on November 19, 1983. He was only 36 years old.

And that's the whole story.

Now? On to the competition!

The Song: Without You
The Competitors: Badfinger vs. Nilsson vs. Heart vs. Manchester vs. Sheppard vs. Air Supply vs. Carey

Without You - Badfinger

Without You - Harry Nilsson

Without You - Heart

Without You - Melissa Manchester

Without You - T.G. Sheppard

Without You - Air Supply

Without You - Mariah Carey

Badfinger

Big bluesy intro, worthy of an Eric Clapton song. Nice voice. A bit strident. Not a great deal of interpretation going on. I like that tiny, jangly, muted, strummed guitar. Not sure how anyone could mistake this as a Beatles song, but I have read, on more than one occasion, that Badfinger was often mistaken for the fab four. 

This is a well-written song, even given its cobbled-together nature (which shows.) Love the plaintive harmony. A bit more of a croon to the voices would have softened the edges. So far, this reminds me of the group, Extreme (No More Words,) except they would have smarmed this up big time. Oh, that's a very real piano coming up from underneath. I like. This is very organic and without pretense. 

I even approve of the electric guitar blasts, and the reverb added to the vocals on 'you should know.'

Oh, dear. That vocal is a bit abrupt. Now, on the chorus? I hear the Beatles, absolutely. It's that shrieking sound, that Lennon brought to the table. An acquired taste. 

I continue to love the vocals on the verses. That's lovely harmony and the voices meld well. I could do without those guitar blasts. Sometimes less is more. Nice, spacey guitar solo. Very sweet. The sound and structure is reminiscent of George Harrison, the playing is not. 

I like the drive on chorus number two. And that additional guitar line running beneath the second half of chorus two is very nice. As the vocals go on, they sound a bit strained. Jumping up that whole octave? Yeah, that can get wearing. There's something very Procol Harum about the arrangement/production at this point; it's the combination of the guitar and organ.

As they attempt to stretch out on the close, it gets almost comical. Reminds me of Lennon during the sessions that would eventually be released as Let It Be. And the Procol Harum comparison becomes even more relevant as that organ rises to the fore. 

Honestly? It makes me want to hear the rest of the album. 

Harry Nilsson

Bright as a penny piano. Nilsson's voice. Flutters like a butterfly, but grounded by some very old-fashioned phrasing. It's a pleasant combination. Brings that first stanza in like a seasoned pilot landing a plane. The contrast between his voice and that strident piano creates a lovely tension. I disagree with how he closes off the open vowel sound on the word 'shows.' But that's a matter of technique. 

The piano downplays itself as a bed of strings is introduced on the second verse. Very lovely, deftly handled. That's one of my favorite producers at the helm, Richard Perry (Leo Sayer, Pointer Sisters, Carly Simon, Barbra Streisand, Ringo, etc.) He knew how to showcase a singer. 

It's Nilsson's unerring sense of phrasing which is making my heart melt, here. And that harmony is thrilling; as if a timid violin were given voice.  His actual technique is a bit precious. He's using kewpie doll lips to create those very narrow sounding vowels. It bothers me, but that's part of his style. 

They made such a bold choice with the chorus. Moving to that lower register? Genius. It allows the arrangement to build anticipation, and Richard Perry does not disappoint. 

That big siren sweep as we launch up an octave. Like the clouds parting. Super dramatic, super effective, and, yet, held in check. And that flex he does with his head voice on the word 'more?' Masterful. A tiny thing, but so effective. He's a singer from different era. 

The doubled vocal harmonies on the start of verse three? A teensy bit muddy, and I don't know why they chose to do that, but it's also a teensy, minor complaint. The play between the strings and the piano is breathtaking. Their use of dynamics in this piece is the kind of thing you wish you could learn. 

And that second chorus. Wow. More dramatics. We'll forgive the siren sound. It's fascinating, a lovely tumble; an example of a voice taking on a physical bearing, physical movement.

They wisely allow the orchestra to take them out. The tension is still palpable. It possesses a lovely drive. 

A stellar performance. A stellar arrangement. Stellar production work. 

Heart

A very early Carpenter's sounding piano. I adore categorizing my piano sounds. 

Ann Wilson's voice is one of a kind. She shares a number of coloring techniques employed by Bette Midler. 

Wow. This is much better than expected. It's very organic, which I always appreciate. I rather like it when the sound captured on a recording matches what you would experience in a live setting. That percussion work? I feel like I am right there watching. 

That heavy back beat, a bit overbearing, but we'll allow it. I still am enjoying how very intimate and present this sounds. 

Ann can be accused of over-singing. No one can annihilate a song in quite the same manner. I've always enjoyed her in a more organic setting where she can relax. Here, her career is in its infancy and her voice is in such a pure state. It's lovely to experience. No one pulls a note back the way she can. Here, she's using kid gloves.

Not sure about their approach on the chorus. That arrangement? Not quite what I was hoping. I think, had Mike Flicker been allowed more time to work a bit of dial magic, the chorus would have a more diaphanous quality. The elements are there in the arrangement, though not as abundant in the chorus. As is? It's a tad bar band sounding.

Wow. Those harmony vocals, again. The sisters sure sound great together. That big orchestral sounding break? You turn the knobs right and that could have sounded magical. 

The orchestra? A bit much. And the arrangement fails in the second chorus, becoming leaden, when it should soar. Third time through, Ann goes solo and just absolutely shreds this. When she is in her Led Zeppelin mode, I get it - it's not to everyone's taste. It does speak to me and I've always liked her sound. Shrill? Sure. 

But that's the point. 

I would have cut this abruptly and dramatically (in a quiet way) at the 4:12 mark. Truncate it, don't play it out. The la-la's? Ick. It fails to make any sort of music point or have a purpose. Too bad. It was a poor choice. 

Melissa Manchester

Back to pianos as bright as a penny. Man, that is knobbed hot. 

Surprised by Manchester's entrance. It's oddly breathy and unsupported. By the second phrase the smokiness I think she was going for begins to fill in. 

The arrangement is fine, a bit standard, but nicely done. Oddly, it does not match at all what Manchester is bringing to the table and I'm thinking they're dining at two different restaurants. 

Her phrasing is there, but it's undercooked. Okay, it's early. Let's see where this goes. But I can tell you right now, this tanked as a single because the singer failed to show up on the first verse. 

Manchester chooses to go big right away. Good for her. She has the vocal chops to pull it off. That light treatment they give her vocals? Takes the edge off. Big strings sawing away, big sound. That's fun. 

Third verse? They decide harmonies are not for her, so she messes with the melody line with mixed results. The vocals are fuller. But I'm still not convinced this is a song she should have been singing at this juncture in her career. 

Listen to that keyboard sound and sequence as we move into the second chorus. Is that lifted from Fire In The Morning or an Anne Murray song? Stephen Dorff wrote both Fire In The Morning and 'I Just Fall In Love, Again' And we just tore apart I Just Fall In Love Again as part of this series a few weeks ago. And Steve Buckingham produced both this version of Without You and Fire In The Morning. I know, I know... silly thing to get caught up in, but I love it when I stumble on borrowed musical items.  

Second chorus same as the first. Vocals set on stun. This, by the way, was a strange transition for Manchester. She was a bohemian, earth mother, songwriter, more at home at a coffee shop than anyplace else. Clive Davis of Arista Records kept pushing her to become a more traditional female entertainer and that's what this album was really all about. It's a leap Manchester could make. She had the show biz patter down, she looked amazing all dolled up, and she had pipes that could sing just about anything handed her. But I don't think it was ever 'her.' She was an incredibly gifted songwriter and I really was always happier when I heard her sing her own material. This isn't karaoke, because there's a lot of thought and effort that went into this recording, but it still begs the question...

Why, Clive? Why? 

You can't take a perfectly good ballet slipper and try to make a glittered high heel out of it. It's not going to work. Better to allow that ballet slipper to dance to the music which best suits it. 

I would have ended this at the 2:52 mark. Manchester and this arrangement have nothing else to bring to this. 

Shame on you, Clive. 

T.G. Sheppard

Back to a very 'Carpenter' sounding piano. I like the tiny changes the pianist makes, changing up that very basic plodding. 

Sheppard isn't doing a very country sound, yet. He sounds more like he's doing a Broadway musical. Introduction of the strings, very reserved. Nice. Not sure what that uplift instrument is between verse one an two... it's vaguely percussive. Is it just a synth?  

His is a very understated, but dramatically effective reading. And I like the additional voices that rally around him before the chorus. 

He drops into a lower register. Effective. Not sure about the airy percussion - it's like puffed wheat, of it's time, has it aged well? Let's find out. I like the dramatic strings. 

I like his voice when he jumps up that octave and the arranger is disciplined enough to keep things in check. I would never classify this as country... yet. I mean, there's a country boy ache in his voice and diction, but this still feels Broadway to me. 

I guess he choice to sing 'choo' instead of 'you' is sort of country. 

Those strings that takeover after the second chorus... way treacly. Did Montovani and his 101 Strings just take the recording session hostage? 

I would have ended this at the 2:45 mark. 

Air Supply

I like the short intro. Russell Hitchcock has a similar touch to his voice as Nilsson, but a much more focused sound. I like the pianist. So far, a very pure reading. His phrasing is not as magical as Nilsson's but lovely all the same. Subtle strings on the second verse, nice, as are the muted harmony vocals as we approach the chorus. 

Wow, I would have placed money that he was going to go big right out the gate, he does not. It's unfortunate that such a talented singer would choose to sing 'choo' instead of 'you.' A minor thing, but something every vocal coach and musical director I ever worked with harped on. 

Huh. I was expecting more when he goes up an octave. More drama. The arrangement doesn't seem to have even noticed. Can't fault the singer. Love what he does with the word 'more.' 

I continue to appreciate the pianist. The introduction of the percussion on the third verse, very subtle. They seem to be keeping everything in check, with the vocals (lovely, muted harmonies) front and center.

Oh, he saved it for the second chorus... that is a huge sound. Dead on. 

Stupid key change, terrible guitar sound. Did someone change the radio station? Doesn't suit what went before at all. 

Wow. I want to kill the guitarist. Talk about failing to read the room.

Love the big dramatic pause, but THAT'S when the key change should have hit. I think of all the times Whitney Houston used that ploy... and know what? It worked every time. 

Here? Because they don't literally take it to the next level, the listener feels a tad let down. Hitchcock is in fine voice. I can't believe the didn't have him go for it. 

This should end at the 3:52 mark. Is there really another whole minute of song? 

Oddly enough, I like some of what the guitarist does with that second solo, but that is the longest fade I have ever heard. 

Mariah Carey

Bright as a penny and a couple keys higher... 

Carey enters all breathy, with just enough bottom to her voice to arrest our attention. And it isn't long before her love of melisma makes it's presence known. 

Second verse, she turns up the warmth by filling out her sound a bit more. This is early enough in her career where she hadn't damaged her voice completely, though, if you listen, you can hear that dry, raspiness scraping the back of her throat, which accounts for her breathiness and why she can't sustain a strong note in her lower range for very long. 

Hey. The lady worked very hard. Those platinum hits didn't sing themselves.

Oh, I like what they've done with 'only fair that I should let you know.' A lovely vocal on top of her voice. Immediately after, they meld and vibrate. That kind of quiver? Musically, not all that acceptable, but our diva must know what she's doing, right? 

She goes for the lower register, good. She sounds... different. Doesn't she? Almost like it's someone else singing. 

I'm not going to say they used auto-correct on her vocals, but... there is something not-quite human about the tonal qualities floating about in this recording. At times, it sound as if she's recording her vocals in a different room. 

Triple Mariah! A little scary. This third verse. Or, is it just me? 

Lots of big vocal breaks. Won't someone get this lady a glass of water?

I know that if you asked Mariah about some of these vocal choices she makes she would tell you that is her style. But - and if you know of an example leave it in the comments section - has our diva ever sang a song, well, straight? No flitting about, no breathiness, no runs, no melisma, no vocal cracks or breaks - just sang a straight melody, straight forward, full voice? 

The answer is no. 

Vision Of Love, which I consider her masterwork, is the closest she's ever come, and, let's face it, all those phenomenal vocal runs are what makes that song so thrilling to listen to.

Yes. Carey has a range. But her vocal technique? Well, one could write a master's thesis detailing everything the lady does in place of proper vocal technique. Yes, Carey has (had) an impressive vocal range, and she has a voice - it's not a singing voice, but it is an interesting voice. 

There's so much studio camouflage in the second chorus I can't tell what's going on. 

I do like the gospel choir. Finally, a play out for this song I approve of. Bravo. 

As for Carey, this is a piece of product, not a performance. I can't imagine all that they've cobbled together and buttressed up and glued into place in order to fill these three and half minutes, but... 

Well... 

I'll just leave it there. 

The Verdict

So, this is harder than I thought.

I must be honest, and you are not going to believe me, but going into this? 

I assumed Carey would walk away this thing. Easily. 

But it has been a long time since I actually listened to her version. 

And having listened to all the other versions? Her take is my least favorite. 

Even Manchester fairs better because at least it's a straight forward performance, not something stitched together in the studio. Manchester has great chops, this just wasn't a great song choice for her.

After I eliminate those two? It gets a lot more difficult.

I like Heart's very live, organic approach. Wilson is in great voice. The ending is a train wreck, but the rest almost works for me. Had Mike Flicker been allowed more time, I think he could have put a bit more shimmer on that arrangement. As is, they sound like a bar band who got some studio time.

I was surprised by how much I enjoyed T.G. Sheppard's interpretation. Very straightforward, with nary a nod to The Grand Old Opry. I really like his voice. His undoing? That sugar sweet string arrangement. I cringed and it made my teeth ache. 

I was really expecting to hate Air Supply's version, because there are very few things they've done that I approve of. However, the vocals were so pure and true to the song, I was charmed... until that hideous electric guitar entered the picture and, oh, let's not forget about the botched Whitney Houston moment. 

I like Badfinger's sound. On the verses. The chorus? Too much Lennon influence and their playout ended up rather comical. 

So, it's Nilsson for me. Great phrasing. Lovely voice. Mostly great technique. He does incredible justice to the song, walking that romantic tight rope only singers like Leo Sayer and Gilbert O'Sullivan can attempt. And Richard Perry's arrangement! Wow. That man continues to blow me away. He has such great instincts as a producer/arranger. 

Yes, this one definitely belongs to Nilsson and Richard Perry. 

--- ---

And that is enough of me. 

To tell you the truth? I don't think I ever want to hear this song again.

Okay... your turn. Let me know what you think. Leave your choice and thoughts in the comments section. I love to hear a differing opinion.

And that's all for now.

Until next time...

Thanks for reading... and listening!

Without You - Badfinger
(1972)

Wednesday, January 19, 2022

Who Did It Better? Johnny And Mary

Who Did It Better? 
Johnny And Mary

Sometimes a song can float about for the longest time, eventually becoming part of the musical landscape without ever becoming a bona fide hit. Today's Who Did It Better? selection is one of those songs.

Johnny And Mary was written and first performed by Robert Palmer as part of his album, Clues, released in 1980. Recorded at Compass Point Studios, New Providence, in the Bahamas and released as the lead single for the album in September 1980, the song hit the #44 spot on the UK Singles Chart, and was a top 40 hit in Canada (#32), Australia (#20), New Zealand (#12), South Africa (#5), Germany (#7), Belgium (#8), Netherlands (#21), Sweden (#11), Switzerland (#5), and snagged the #1 slot in Spain. 

Stateside, the song failed to chart on Billboard's Hot 100, however it did well in the clubs, reaching #18 on the Club Play Singles chart.

In 1982, Tina Turner was a free agent, touring constantly and going wherever work was offered. At the time she had been doing a bit of experimenting, working with a group of musicians who would help shape her sound, eventually leading to her breakthrough solo album, Private Dancer (1984). Her version of Johnny And Mary is part of that experimentation. It (along with another recording of hers called Crazy In The Night) would appear on the soundtrack for the 1982 film, Summer Lovers, which would feature songs by Elton John, Depeche Mode, Michael Sembello, Chicago, Heaven 17, and Nona Hendryx.

Ellen Foley initially gained high public recognition singing with Meat Loaf on the hit single Paradise by the Dashboard Light from the 1977 smash album Bat Out of Hell. Typically, that should have been enough to cement her place in music history, but a bit of confusion ensued. Yes, that's Karla DeVito, who toured with Meat Loaf in support of the album, in the music video, however, she's lip synching Foley's vocals! But no worries, Foley would snag an album contract on Epic records and cover Johnny And Mary for her third album, 1983's Another Breath. It was released as a single, but failed to chart.

Coming off of the surprise success of her 1982 hit, You Should Hear How She Talks About You, suddenly Melissa Manchester was all about electronic dance music. Her 11th album, 1983's Emergency would feature her version of Johnny And Mary. She looked great, but, the public wasn't buying it. Emergency would prove to be her final album on Arista Records after a ten year run. 

Johnny And Mary was used as the signature tune in advertisements promoting Renault cars throughout the 1980s and 1990s. It has been recorded by numerous performers since, including Status Quo, Placebo, and Bryan Ferry (w/ Todd Terje.)

And that's the whole story.

Now? On to the competition!

The Song: Johnny And Mary
The Competitors: Palmer vs. Turner vs. Foley vs. Manchester

Johnny and Mary - Robert Palmer


Johnny And Mary - Tina Turner

Johnny And Mary - Ellen Foley

Johnny And Mary - Melissa Manchester

Robert Palmer

Have always loved this song. Keep in mind that this version was done in 1980. The concept of big beats were a long way off and recording technology was advancing, but still rather rudimentary. That was true of synthesizers, as well. Given all that, this song is remarkably ahead of its time and felt as foreign as the alien landscapes of Gary Numan (whom Palmer was collaborating with at the time.)

It's the propulsion that hooks me. Instantly. The first verse is pitched rather low in Palmer's range, but that's because he needs to pop up an octave later in the song - I'm assuming. I think that's the reason the song never popped on AM radio. His voice in this range? It doesn't cut through sharply enough to engage the listener's ear. 

I love the distant perspective of the lyrics. The observations are almost clinical in nature. This is a fascinating story, a sort of post mortem autopsy of a relationship. 

I dislike the instrumental bridge. It fails to cut through, too. And the synths all feel muted and fail to engage. It's actually quite clever stuff - that synthesized guitar - but too subtle for AM radio. Still adore the propulsive beat. 

Palmer continues in his lower range for the second round. There's something almost monotone about his dispassionate delivery. Love that scratchy synthesizer sawing away in the background. The second instrumental break is an improvement on the first. But, I guess, it brings home exactly why this didn't hit big stateside. The US simply wasn't sophisticated enough to appreciate it yet. At the time, I imagine, this sounded more like a science experiment than a pop song.

Weird vocalization on 'lonely.' Not sure of the motive there. 

Love the guitar work on the final instrumental break. Subtle and chunky. Had he introduced that earlier, it might have grabbed listeners. But not only does Palmer fail to seize on the more pronounced elements of the new wave sound, he also fails to pop up an octave, rendering this too mumbled and cold. A bit of heat would have helped a great deal. I mean, why repeat the first verse unless you're going to bring something more dramatic to it? 

Kudos on the experimental nature of this exercise, but it fails as a pop song because it simply is not savvy enough to engage the listener.

Tina Turner

I immediately like the brighter sound and the heavy synth swaths utilized in this arrangement. Those drums are crisp. 

Tina's vocals cut where Palmer's failed to, right out the gate. Her vocals are overtreated, but it's an interesting mix with her vibrato and the reverb, creating a kind of tension. Great beat. Adore the S.O.S. signals (strings?) stinging in and out in the background.  

Huh, the instrumental break is a tad boring, but Turner's added vocalizing brings the fire. 

I am just allowing this to wash over me. I can't believe this was never released as a single. It's a perfect marriage and you can totally hear where Turner was headed, creatively. 

Wow, really love her vocal choices on the play out. 

This is a very winning performance. On the part of Turner.

The arrangement and production work? A tad rote.

Ellen Foley

That guitar sting right at the opening, a definite bid to grab a radio listener's ear. The synths are too high in the mix and I really wish the rhythm guitar was mixed hotter. It's the new wave drive we need to grab onto and it's lost here.

Her voice is super strong, mixed very clear. She bleats a bit, and then compensates by throwing her voice under her chin. It's an interesting vocal choice, an intriguing combination. The multi-tracked vocals on the chorus don't work for me. 

I do like the harmonies on the second verse. Nice touch. Weird phrasing choice on "Mary combs her hair..."

I don't know that the multi-tracked vocals on the chorus works. Suddenly we go from a single POV to this wall of observers... it's contrary to the songwriter's intent. And the lead guitar work feels very rote. It should be more like a David Bowie freak out (think of Adrian Belew's work on the Lodger album) than a by-the-numbers reading of the melody. 

I do love all the drama Foley is bringing to this. She gets it. I only wish the arrangement and production work were on the same page. This could have been a very Lena Lovich moment. 

Dislike the angel chorus. Those backing vocals on the play out... blech.

A very schizophrenic read. Musically, not everyone here is on the same page.

Melissa Manchester

I like the beat. Wish that synth was turned up several degrees. 

A very muscular reading. Manchester sounds sure and in charge. I'm buying this. 

Love those subtle synth washes in the back ground. Icy and effective. That pulsing, throbbing synth holding the bottom line... that is propelling this thing. I like. 

Huh. I wonder where the additional lyrics came from. It does add a different dimension to the song. Fleshing it out a bit, which strikes me as contrary to Palmer's original dystopian stance for the piece. 

I really like the production work here. I like the synth arrangements, as well. Manchester's super strong vocals are just idiosyncratic enough to keep things interesting and I rather enjoy her occasional toss off ("ha!", for example). 

The additional lyrics (by Bernie Taupin!) are a tad problematic, but then I understand why they are there. This is Melissa Manchester, not some robotic android goddess. She's always been about the heart and the human condition. It helps make the song more 'her.'

I like the male backing vocals with Manchester's voice. Great choice. As is the tiny Manchester echo at the end of certain phrases. That pulsing, throbbing synth is not, however, interesting enough to stand solo for an eight count. However, the Gary Numan inspired instrumental bit that follows? Wow. 

And Manchester pays ode to the original by popping down an octave. Much more effective later in the piece than if she had started the song that way. Interesting choice on "pro-por-tion." And the oddness just increases as we play out. I am done with this at the 3:41 mark, but she and the producer/arranger Arif Mardin, with great assist from back-up singers, David Lasley, Marcy Levy (Eric Clapton), and Ula Hedwig (Bette Midler), manage to put a lot of interesting elements into play for the remainder of the song.

It's as if there are two different songs here, melded together. Everything before the 2:31 mark is rather straightforward, but after that pulsing synth throbs for a count of eight it enters another world. 

I don't think this could have been a hit for her, but it is really quite interesting and a stretch for Manchester. She manages to pull it off really well. 

A side note: Manchester's Emergency album, her final work for Arista, failed because it ended up being such a mish-mash of conflicting ideas. Big, melodramatic ballads sitting side-by-side with more alien fare, such as Johnny And Mary? It was too confusing for the average consumer. Clive, and perhaps Manchester herself, wanted a foot in both camps and the two styles proved contradictory to one another leaving the public confused and apathetic.

The Verdict

I love this song. It's one in a long line of observational domestic situation songs. Think back to John Prine's Hello In There and Manchester's own Through The Eyes Of Grace. Capturing those tiny, intimate moments... breathtaking stuff.

This is tougher than I thought.

Palmer's version, while accomplishing his creative objectives, fails as a hit single. Nothing there cuts through, other than the propulsive nature of the beat. 

Foley's version can't quite make up it's mind about what it wants to be - a straight ahead pop rocker or something more esoteric? She has great chops, but needed to take a firm stand.

Manchester's version is far better than one would expect. I really like both halves. Her vocals are super strong, as is the production work throughout with great assist from those backing vocalists. 

Tina Turner's version is on fire from note one. Something about the melancholy nature that resides within her voice, no matter what she is singing, adds a great deal of poignancy to this microcosmic slice-of-life song. 

It's really between Manchester and Turner for me. 

And I am going with...

Tina Turner.

Her version is simpler and more succinct than Manchester's. There's also that distinctive howl of hers which lends a strangely chilling melancholy to the proceedings, all the while her vocal fireworks are on full display. She's always had great chops and its fun listening to her find her way into this (then) new sound. It's a shame it was never pushed as a single.

--- ---

And that's enough of me.

Okay, your turn. What did you think? Leave your thoughts and choice in the comments section. I love to hear from you! Differing opinion? Bring it on.

That's all for now.

Until next time...

Thanks for reading... and listening!

Johnny And Mary - Robert Palmer

Wednesday, July 28, 2021

Who Did It Better? Pretty Girls

Who Did It Better?
Pretty Girls

Okay, don't get too excited. This is not the Britney Spears/Iggy Azalea song.

This one is coming to us via Wonderland Burlesque's WayBack Machine - from 1978/1979 to be precise.

Written by one of Canada's not-so-hidden treasures, Lisa Dal Bello, Pretty Girls was the titular song of her second album. Dal Bello began her career as a mainstream pop/dance artist, releasing three albums under her given name. She won a Juno Award in 1978 for Most Promising Female Vocalist of the Year. She would be nominated in various categories as a vocalist, producer and songwriter seven more times.

Her second album Pretty Girls was released independently on Talisman Records (later issued by Capitol Records), garnering her a second Juno nomination in 1979 in the category of Female Vocalist of the Year. The song was released as the first single from the album in 1978, but only managed to reach #84 on the Canadian charts.

Due to her powerful voice and personality, pop music was didn't feel like the right fit for Dal Bello. After taking time off to reevaluate her career, she came back in 1984 using a single name, DalBello, venturing into more experimental sounds and enjoying even bigger success in Canada, with songs such as Black on Black and Tango.

During her career she has worked with: Boz Scaggs, Heart, Bryan Adams, Mick Ronson, Carole Bayer Sager, Toto, Bruce Roberts, Franne Golde, Chaka Khan, Patti LaBelle, Julian Lennon, David Foster, Dan Hill, and Holly Knight.

Although Dal Bello never enjoyed full-fledged success in the US, thanks to acts like Heart, Boz Scaggs and Queensrÿche, she definitely made inroads. In 1979, Melissa Manchester covered her song, Pretty Girls, marking Dal Bello's first international success as a songwriter.

If Clive Davis were to sing a song about Melissa Manchester's time at the label it probably would have started with the line, "How do you solve a problem like Melissa?" The year 1979 found Manchester and Arista Records struggling to figure out how to follow-up the success of her surprise 1978 smash, Don't Cry Out Loud.  Her self-titled album released that year would bare the hallmarks of that indecision. 

Recorded in Atlanta in September 1979 with local producer Steve Buckingham (I Love The Night Life), Manchester's eighth album would yield two Top 40 hits. Dal Bello's composition, Pretty Girls was released as the lead single three weeks in advance of the album. It was the first upbeat single to preview a Melissa Manchester album and would also serve as Manchester's extended dance single debut. Despite this, her first foray into dance pop barely registered on the Top 40, with the single peaking at #39 on the Billboard Hot 100. 

But, as they say, if you wanna make a cake, you gotta break some eggs. Or should that be: if at first you don't succeed...? Her second try at dance pop? 1982's You Should Hear How They Talk About You, which would end up the best selling single of her career, reaching #5 on Billboard's Hot 100, and winning her a Grammy as Best Female Vocalist. 

And there you have the full story. 

Now, on to the competition. 

The Song: Pretty Girls
The Competitors: Dal Bello vs. Manchester

Pretty Girls - Lisa Dal Bello

Pretty Girls - Melissa Manchester


Lisa Dal Bello

That intro reminds me of Rock The Boat by The Hues Corporation. And I love that song, so this is feeling very fun to my ears. Remember... this was a very different time. Cheesy still had some pull when it came to the radio. Also, disco was on it's way out and new wave artists like Blondie, The Cars, and Talking Heads were taking over. This song strands the span between those two worlds while also incorporating standard bits of pop and MOR magic. Given that? This song has always struck me as a bit of a mess; a great idea in need of a bit more fine tuning. 

The lyrics? Fairly edgy for the time. Do they always make sense? Do they need to? This is a song about a horny, somewhat predatory drugstore cosmetic salesman. Also, and I don't know quite sure why this is, but this song reminds me of The Grass Roots classic Sooner Or Later (Love Is Gonna Get You). It has something to do with the prominent piano and certain chord progressions. 

Vocally, this is not the DalBello who would reemerge in 1984. This is Dal Bello light. There's a hint of the snarl that's to be part of her trademark future sound, but she actually sounds like a lot of black female pop singers from this time, such as Maxine Nightingale, who would enjoy a second visit to the US Top Ten that same year. 

I love the piano and the fact that's driving this thing. It's very fresh sounding. I do wish her vocals were higher in the mix and knobbed a bit hotter. I like the tension the piano brings to the bridge leading to the chorus. 

The complete change in vocal tone, going into an alto and then the shouted, "Pretty Girl" feels abrupt. Not necessarily a bad thing, but then why didn't they introduce some new instrumental elements? Synthesizers did, in fact, exist then, and I think, used properly, it could have boosted this chorus. Instrumentally, the chorus ends up sounding disco lite, especially due to those hollow accent bell tones.  

Ooh! I like what she does with "Femme fatale is all he needs..." Very tasty.  

Just when I was thinking there is no C section, as in a true bridge, we get that drop out and spoken word bit. It works, though I think the absence of a true bridge is why I feel this song is undercooked. It could have added an additional musical dimension to the song, and also helped flesh out the narrative.

Dal Bello is doing some very interesting things vocally. Her phrasing is very deft. She takes risks and they pay off, revealing plenty of attitude. I love the way they move back into the chorus. Quite sly and economical. And that "girls, girls, girls!" It's a shame that wasn't used earlier. It could have overstayed it's welcome but it might have been the hook missing from this one. 

Remember! Cheesy ruled the day.

For the time period... this was edgy stuff. First, she tackles predatory male behavior which, thanks to the sexual revolution, cocaine, and disco fever had been allowed to go unchecked for years. Secondly, she tackles a couple topics sure to warm any feminists heart. There's the objectification the beauty industry forces on the female population that's addressed, as well as the fact that it was being force fed to underage girls, or as Dal Bello puts it, "baby girls." Radical stuff for a little slice of disco lite pop in 1978.

So, kudos to Lisa Da Bello.

Melissa Manchester

Remember those synths missing from Da Bello's version? A year later they found their way to Atlanta just in time for Manchester to record this song. That's a fat sounding intro. It practically blats. It's got some swagger. And a melody line by an actual string section. This already sounds more substantial than Dal Bello's take and a lot more polished. Maybe too much so? 

I like Manchester's attack. Plus, with her articulation you know exactly what the words are. It could also have something to do with her vocals riding on top of the mix.  The bridge into the chorus? Ah, cowbell! Vocally, a bit strident. A bit over-pronounced. She's hammering those notes. I dislike those guitar accents. Its a dated sound. Ick. 

She avoids the weird backdraft into the chorus we experienced on Da Bello's version. Those backing vocals compliment Manchester's voice and add just as solid a sound as Manchester's own. There's the piano! I like the ascending strings. Subtly effective. 

Huh. "Reserve the luxury of feline company." That's mixed way too hot and comes across as a bit shrill. Manchester's vocals are very strident. She's doing a hard sell here, working way too hard. Vocally, bit more color would be nice. She should be playing with the dynamics a lot more. 

That little guitar solo after the second chorus works. What is that? A synth, a horn section? It's weird. Kind of blatting. 

"I told you that he'd get you right between the eyes." is unique to Manchester's version. I don't know what it means in relation to the rest of the song. It's very effective. Kind show stopping. And delivered well. 

Huh. Manchester cuts loose on those repeated choruses. "Hey, Mistaaaah!" Too funny. I can picture her jaw dropping as she sang that. Unfortunately, the instrumental section that follows is rather lame. I like Manchester's reentry. Girl is singing tough. Of course, she's also pretty much shouting the chorus with a few vocal flourishes thrown in. 

Huh. 

The Verdict:

Huh.

I remember exactly where I was standing the first time I heard this song play on my local radio station. I stopped what I was doing and moved to the radio and tried to divine what it was that was so familiar about it. I thought it was rather exotic, a bit alien. It definitely caught and held my attention. When they announced it was Melissa Manchester, you could of knocked me over with a feather. 

So, Manchester brings to the table the wicked element I was hoping to hear in the Dal Bello version. Perhaps, too much so? 

Overall, the Manchester version is meatier. Dal Bello's sounds undercooked. Under produced.

This is a weird song and is somewhat unique in Manchester's catalog. Not that she wouldn't try on New Wave - she does a cover of Robert Palmer's Johnny and Mary for her final Arista album. But this isn't something one would expect her to sing about. And that's why it feels like such an odd fit. Intriguing, though. 

Dal Bello was still discovering her powers. The woman who reemerged as DalBello is the wicked queen that I wish would have shown up in 1978 for this number. I wonder if she ever considered rewriting or reworking this song. 

I like them both. I like the piano driven arrangement Dal Bello employs, and her vocals are much slyer and more subtle than Manchester's. 

Manchester vocally chews the scenery on this one. It's very strident. Very forced. But, and I can personally attest to this, it worked well on AM Radio. 

So, the nod goes to Manchester. 

--- ---

And that's my two cents' worth.

Okay... your turn. Let me know what you think. Leave your thoughts in the comments section. You know how I love to hear from you. 

If you have a suggestion for a future Who Did It Better?, leave it in the comments section. If it checks out, we'll get to it eventually. Surprisingly, I still have a good dozen to go.

That's all for now.

Thanks reading... and listening!

Pretty Girls - Melissa Manchester

Tuesday, July 13, 2021

Wonderland Burlesque's Once Upon A Wish Quiz

Wonderland Burlesque's 
Once Upon A Wish Quiz

Ever wish upon a star?

What did you wish for?

That's what we're going to explore today... those things you, in your heart of hearts, long to see and experience, just once!

You can make it as simple as you like... merely list your items, or explain your choices, if you wish.

Now. This is not a bucket list. Because you can wish for whatever you like. 

Sometimes these things are very tangible, as in - they do exist or once existed. Or they can be things/places/people you wish existed.

Yes, today? "A wish is a dream your heart makes..."

--- ---  

1/ A movie or television episode you wish you could see just once...

I have one of each. 

I would love to see the complete, uncut, original Orson Welles rough cut of The Magnificent Ambersons. I am almost certain that, had it been released without studio interference, Agnes Moorehead would have won that Oscar. 

Welles was a masterful storyteller, and the story of The Magnificent Ambersons had so much going for it. I imagine that Welles alternative ending was far more suitable to the story than that of the released movie version or book. 

The other one... well! It too, exists. 

It's the unaired episode of Sky Art's British biographical comedy/drama television series Urban Myths, titled Elizabeth, Michael, and Marlon, which depicts a road trip that allegedly took place after the 9/11 attacks. Because all flights were grounded, Michael Jackson, Elizabeth Taylor and Marlon Brando, in part, fearing for their lives, flee New York City for Los Angeles in a car.

Imagine: Joseph Fiennes as Michael Jackson, Brian Cox as Marlon Brando, Stockard Channing as Elizabeth Taylor, and Carrie Fisher playing herself.

I so want this to have actually happened and I so want to see this episode. I realize the controversy surrounding the casting of Ralph Fiennes as Michael Jackson is a valid one - white actors playing black characters is a no-go. 

However, the idea of Stockard Channing playing circa 2001 Elizabeth Taylor has me salivating. Plus, putting these three personalities in a single car together and sending them cross country? 

Genius. And pure madness.

2/ An album or song you wish you could hear just once...

Only Forever by Anita Baker (2012)
Togetherland by Seal (1999-2001)
Trojan Souls by George Michael (1993)
The Gouster by David Bowie (1974)

All unreleased. All lost to time or sitting in a vault somewhere. 
 
3/ A book you wish you could read just once...

Naked On My Goat by actress Louise Brooks.
 
An autobiographical novel. After working on it for years, in a state of madness, she threw it into an incinerator.

4/ Something you dream of eating, drinking, or tasting just once...

So, this one is simple and very doable. But will I ever? 

I should like a chilled glass of Roederer Cristal Rose, 2009. Here's a description I found:

"The rarest Champagne produced by Louis Roederer. Salmon pink with an elegant bouquet and flavors of cherries and red berries that mingle with aromas of lightly toasted nuts and a trace of orange zest. A truly harmonious Rose, delicate, but powerful and enduring."

Or, for that matter, I would settle for regular Cristal. The problem? The price points. I'm the sort that can't see the sense of it. 

I dislike champagne. Loathe it's treacly sweetness. But, for some reason, there exists this idea that if you're spending $300-$500 on a bottle of something - it will be unlike any you've experienced before. That's true of roller blades and bicycles. Is it true of champagne? 

I would kick myself for the rest of my life if I was so foolish as to purchase a bottle of the stuff only to find out that it's just as vile as every other champagne I've tasted. I'd rather donate the money to The Humane Society.

Still... because this is the only thing Mariah Carey drinks (reportedly) I remain intrigued. 

I mean, she's an absolute beacon of good taste, yes? 

(Cheshire Cat grin appears.) 

5/ Some activity you wish you could experience just once...

Sexual ones? A ton. But their/my time has passed and I would feel foolish (and a bit of a bore) listing them. 

And I think about performing somewhere or appearing in a specific play - but how egotistical and what a waste of time and energy that would be. Like anybody wants to see that?

Skydiving? I'd want to do it only once and all by myself. Who would be negligent enough to let me?

Oh... I have it.

I want to attend Melissa Manchester's course on songwriting at USC Thornton School of Music. She fascinates me, as does her songwriting, which I have always found to be unlike anyone else's. 

To understand why, you really have to go back to her roots. Those early albums on Bell Records reveal an artist who, upon finding initial success, was never again planted in an appropriate garden. Her songwriting was her super power, and had she been allowed to grow mature in a nurturing environment? Who knows what further wonders she would have revealed. 

As is? There are tons of hints and loads of great songs to enjoy. So I am grateful. And impressed.

I would simply love the opportunity to hear her talk about her craft and learn more about her process. Those students at USC Thorton? 

Damn lucky.

6/ Some event you wish you could attend just once...


The birth of Christianity. So I could put an end to it right then and there!

No. 

George Michael's Symphonica Tour (2011-12).  Or any solo performance. I would have loved to have experienced his music in a live setting. Of course, I would be in the nosebleed section, but then... his magic would have filled the arena, so it wouldn't matter. 

7/ A building or landmark you would like to visit just once...

Stephen Sondheim's dungeon. 

The backroom of a really active, really gritty gay bar in New York City or San Francisco. 

Lynwood Hall - Philadelphia, PA - I adore abandoned buildings, with all their secrets and history. I have a long list of abandoned houses that I would love to walk through. Something about their decay intrigues me. Also, frequently? MURDER was afoot!

8/ A city or a country you would like to visit just once...

There are so many that I absolutely plan on seeing - and I will make those happen. 

But there is one place I will never go and would love to... Moscow. 

Russia terrifies me. In fact, all those countries where corruption is king are places I won't be visiting. I'm not sure why such places have not evolved, but then, I look at the United States' current affairs and ask the same question. 

It's the thought of becoming trapped somewhere, with no freedom and no power. It leaves me cold. 

Come to think of it... Mississippi gives me that same feeling.

9/ Someone you could talk to for a half hour just once...

Oh, I was trying to think of someone else, but... nope. 

I just have to go with what I know in my heart.

Janis Ian. 

She fascinates me. Her talent. Her gifts. 

Plus she's on the other side of things now and, I do believe, is much more grounded than ever before. There's a kindness there. A sense of humor. And a bit of humility. 

10/ Someone you could kiss just once...

Sandra Bernhardt. I know that woman knows how to kiss. Plus, she would make it really fun.

Lil' Nas X is my second choice. He's too young, but... I could teach him a thing or two. 

John Amos, Marvin Gaye and Idris Elba. And our own Sixpence... 'cuz - I gotta feelin'.


--- ---

That's it. Short and sweet.

Now? It's your turn.

Leave your answers in the comments section, or post on your blog and leave a link here. 

I hope you had a lovely time wishing. 

Thanks for being here.

Give Him A Great Big Kiss - The Shangri-las


















Kiss Me, Honey Honey, Kiss Me − Shirley Bassey