Followers

Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label Ignorance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ignorance. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

Cardinal Raymond Burke Explains It All For You


Cardinal Raymond Burke 
Explains It All For You

What year is it? 

Well, it would seem to be 1952 in the mind of Catholic Cardinal Raymond Burke.  The recently demoted Cardinal (he got the shaft  after publicly challenging Pope Francis’ more tolerant approach toward LGBT people) shared his rather retro views with the website ‘The New Emangelism: Drawing Men to Jesus Christ and His Catholic Church’ on what is wrong with the Catholic Church and your jaw will drop once you hear what he has to say.

But before we begin, take a moment and check out that website name: ‘Emangelism’?  (Roll eyes here.)

I don’t know about you, but if I hear one more over-privileged Caucasian male whine about being marginalized or discriminated against I am going to put on a pair of kinky boots, take to the pavement, and scream my head off.

Burke (who actually has been recently marginalized by his boss, the Pope), proffered the following thoughts:

·         That the forces of “radical feminism” have brought the once-mighty Church to its knees, leading to a “fluffy,” feminized view of sexuality and made way for generations of pedophile priests.

·         That the Church needs to return to its male-centered roots and stop catering to “women’s issues” in order to regain its once robust standing in the world.

Oh hell, let’s let the man’s own words hang his sorry misogynistic, homophobic ass.

“I think there has been a great confusion with regard to the specific vocation of men in marriage and of men in general in the Church during the past 50 years or so. It’s due to a number of factors, but the radical feminism which has assaulted the Church and society since the 1960s has left men very marginalized.”

“Unfortunately, the radical feminist movement strongly influenced the Church, leading the Church to constantly address women’s issues at the expense of addressing critical issues important to men; the importance of the father, whether in the union of marriage or not; the importance of a father to children; the importance of fatherhood for priests; the critical impact of a manly character; the emphasis on the particular gifts that God gives to men for the good of the whole society.”

“The goodness and importance of men became very obscured.”

“I recall in the mid-1970’s, young men telling me that they were, in a certain way, frightened by marriage because of the radicalizing and self-focused attitudes of women that were emerging at that time. These young men were concerned that entering a marriage would simply not work because of a constant and insistent demanding of rights for women. These divisions between women and men have gotten worse since then.”

“Making things worse, there was a very fluffy, superficial kind of catechetical approach to the question of human sexuality and the nature of the marital relationship.”

“The gift of human sexuality is turned into a means of selfgratification often at the expense of another person, whether in heterosexual relations or in homosexual relations. A man who has not been formed with a proper identity as a man and as a father figure will ultimately become very unhappy. These poorly formed men become addicted to pornography, sexual promiscuity, alcohol, drugs, and the whole gamut of addictions.”

(The Church itself has become)… “very feminized. Women are wonderful, of course. They respond very naturally to the invitation to be active in the Church. Apart from the priest, the sanctuary has become full of women. The activities in the parish and even the liturgy have been influenced by women and have become so feminine in many places that men do not want to get involved.”

“We can also see that our seminaries are beginning to attract many strong young men who desire to serve God as priests. The new crop of young men are manly and confident about their identity. This is a welcome development, for there was a period of time when men who were feminized and confused about their own sexual identity had entered the priesthood; sadly some of these disordered men sexually abused minors; a terrible tragedy for which the Church mourns.”

On girls as altar servers: “Young boys don’t want to do things with girls. It’s just natural.  The girls were also very good at altar service. So many boys drifted away over time. I want to emphasize that the practice of having exclusively boys as altar servers has nothing to do with inequality of women in the Church.”

On masturbation: “Young men may begin to engage in the sexual sin of masturbation. Men have told me that when they were teenagers, they confessed the sin of masturbation in the confessional and priests would say, ‘Oh, that’s nothing you should be confessing. Everybody does that.’ That’s wrong. These are sinful acts. They need to be confessed along with other types of sins, whether the sins are foul language, lying, stealing, or whatever it might be. The denial of sin was a breakdown in the sense of what is demanded of men as men of Christ.”

“We have to be very clear with men about purity, chastity, modesty and even the way men dress and present themselves. Men’s behaviors and dress matter, for it affects how they relate to the world and it affects the culture. Men need to dress and act like men in a way that is respectful to themselves, to women and to children.”

His advice to fellow clergy?

“First of all, be manly yourself. In other words, cultivate your own manly qualities, because the priest is first and foremost the spiritual father; he is a man. You need to have manly qualities of selflessness, chivalry and discipline to avoid situations improper for a priest. A priest must have the manly confidence and credibility to be a spiritual father to his flock, giving clear firm guidance with kindness and charity.”

Had enough?  Did all that crap induce your gag reflex yet?

All this Ernest Hemingway bullshit spewed by a man who, while working at the Vatican, donned a $20,000 jeweled hat for one prayer service and a cape with an elaborate 20-foot train that cost more than $30,000 for another.  His taste in ceremonial garb did not escape the attention of his superiors, for ‘Queen Burke’ was indeed chastised for it. 

I mean, I like a good show as good as anyone, but $30,000 for a single costume?  Just think of all that could have been done on behalf of the poor with that money.

And all this concern from a man who, while he was the Cardinal of St. Louis, imported predator priests into his diocese from other areas in order to shield them from investigation. In a report from the organization Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP), Burke was found to be “reckless, deceptive and callous regarding predator priests, vulnerable kids and wounded victims”.

Keep in mind, historically; it has been in the best interest of the Catholic Church to keep their congregations subservient and poor.  In the past, women have toiled in the background, providing the community lifeblood of small congregations going for generations.  It has also been in the Church’s best interest to keep these women barefoot and pregnant: what better means of finding new congregants than getting them fresh out of the oven? 

It matters not.

People like Burke and those who would actually come up with the term ‘Emangelism’ are powerless cranks unwilling to get with the program.

It’s 2015, folks. 

And it is time to grow the fuck up.














Wednesday, January 07, 2015

The Problem With Arizona


Seems the Grand Canyon is only one of many ‘big holes’ in the great state of Arizona.

Here’s an example illustrating why the state of Arizona is so f*cked up:

A ‘notice of noncompliance’ has been sent by John Huppenthal, Arizona’s state superintendent of public education to the Tucson Unified School District to cease using the following as teaching aids:

·         Lyrics from Rage Against The Machine’s ‘Take The Power Back’
·         KRS-One’s essay ‘An Introduction To Hip-Hop’
·         A handout: ‘Why was American slavery the most brutal in history?’
·         The recitation of Mayan and Aztec teachings

Why?

Because they violate ARS- 15-112; a 2010 law that prohibits teaching classes which “promote the overthrow of the United States government,” “are designed primarily for pupils of a particular ethnic group,” or “advocate ethnic solidarity instead of the treatment of pupils as individuals.”

Failure to comply with the superintendents demands will result a ten percent cut in state funding for the school district, starting March 4th.  (So… ten percent of nothing equals…)

Huh?

Please note those last two clauses. 

Seems Arizona would like to prevent all those “ethnics” from provoking their constitutional right to freely assemble.  You know, because when ‘those people’ all get together, why they might get up to some no good or get organized, or something. 

How very xenophobic of Arizona. 

One would hope that we were past such unfounded fears, but I suspect the recent Ferguson protests and all that has followed has the state, home of Governor Jan Brewer and Sheriff Joe Arpaio, all up in arms and on high alert. 

And speaking of the devil…

In other Arizona related news, a judge has ordered Sheriff Joe Arpaio to cease raiding businesses in the hopes of catching illegal immigrants and take the same training as his deputies to prevent racial profiling and unlawful detention.

You see, the good sheriff takes issue with all those illegal aliens taking all those American jobs.  Apparently, he believes ‘this land is our land’ – despite the fact this land actually was inhabited by someone else before Caucasians arrived on the scene.

Yep.  One’s desire to be ignorant does not change historical fact. 

And, last time I checked, ignorance is not a constitutional right.

But, I guess Arizona would disagree… and probably, given how proud they are of their racist, xenophobic, ignorant ways, has a law on the books stating exactly that.

Ditat Deus, indeed.





Monday, December 22, 2014

Wonderland Burlesque's Turdscooter of the Week: Rick Wiles


Wonderland Burlesque's 
Turdscooter of the Week
Rick Wiles

“Who you gonna call?”

That is the burning question this week, according to one Rick Wiles.

Yes, ladies and gentlemen, as long as there are ‘men of god’ and self-righteous conservatives, so shall there be a “Turdscooter of the Week”.  And what would right-wing nut jobs do if it were not for the bilious pockets of shelter afforded them by American radio?

This week’s winner?  

Trunews radio host Rick Wiles, who seems to believe that when old dubba-u, dubba-u three breaks out, God won’t be saving the neck of America like he did last time during dubba-u dubba-u two.

Who knows, maybe it’s because God doesn’t care for sequels of a sequel? 

But, no, Mr. Wiles insists it’s because of the gays.  In his way of thinking, granting gays equal rights and allowing them to marry has doomed this country.

But, never fear… there’s hope, according to Wiles and his vision of this inevitable future:

“Worse case scenario is the submarines come up on the west coast and the east coast and just obliterate us while we sleep at night.”

Wait.  Is that a ‘worse’ case or a ‘best’?  Hmmm.  Apples, oranges?

Whatever the case, Wiles is certain that those pesky ruskies will soon be aiming their nuclear warheads at our golden shores (you know, as soon as the ruble stabilizes and, oh, I don’t know, Sony Pictures’ ‘The Interview’ wins an Oscar for best motion picture).

“We are on the edge of World War III,” claims Wiles. “And this time the United States of America does not have divine protection because we've become a nation of homosexuals and atheists and lesbians and God-haters.”

Did I forget to mention the atheists, lesbians and God-haters? 

Well, at least the gays are in good company. 

Mr. Wiles rants on:

“What are you going to do America?  If he (God) left and the Russian nukes show up? If the Russian submarines show up and you find out God left? Who you gonna call on, all you atheists? All you homosexuals?  All you God-haters?  Is your ‘gay god’ going to come and save you?”

Who you gonna call, indeed!

Well, not “gay god”.  That’s for sure. 

He still can't throw a baseball worth shit.

But Gay Jesus, on the other hand...






Monday, November 03, 2014

Wonderland Burlesque’s Turdscooter of the Week: Pastor James David Manning


Wonderland Burlesque’s 
Turdscooter of the Week: 
Pastor James David Manning

I remain fascinated by the workings of the human mind, particularly when it comes to matters of religion and religious calling.  For some, it takes a leap of faith, while for others it would seem to involve incredible leaps in logic.

Take Pastor James David Manning of the Atlah Worldwide Church in Harlem, New York, renowned homophobe and host of the online series ‘The Manning Report’, who believes that “upscale sodomites” enjoying their lattes at Starbucks could be aiding (pun intended) the spread of Ebola.

In his own words:

“Starbucks coffee stores are indeed ground zero for spreading Ebola and other diseases, because of the clientele of Starbucks. Generally upscaled [sic] sodomites who frequent Starbucks, who sit there with their computers and it's a meeting place, they exchange a lot of body fluids, hands shaken and contact. Stay away from Starbucks if you don't want to get Ebola. And especially the Starbucks in the urban areas.”

Now, I guess this should not come as a big surprise, coming out of the mouth of a man who also believes that it would be appropriate to stone gays “back to hell”, but let’s keep in mind that (according to science) the Ebola virus is not spread through casual contact and that the only people who have contracted it in the U.S. are people who have been treating patients with the virus.   

I mean, those are facts.  

But, hey, why listen to medical professionals and scientists when it’s much more fun (and self-serving) to simply make shit up!  Especially about people you don’t like.  Because then, it’s not discrimination, but a matter of concern for the health and well-being of those you do like. 

Creating unfound fears?  Oh, yeah… that’s the stuff of ‘God’. 

Sadly, I don’t believe Pastor Manning to be clever or aware enough to spout these things simply as a means of getting attention.  No, I think he really believes the laughable crap that falls from his mouth like so many clowns in a circus parade.

So, let’s all raise a cup of our choice in a salute to this week’s Turdscooter: Pastor James David Manning of the Atlah Worldwide Church in Harlem New York.

If ignorance is indeed bliss, then James David must be one of the happiest fucking people on earth.





 



Saturday, July 23, 2011

Is This Lunch or A Tea Party? Battling Ignorance in the Workplace

I went to lunch today with a couple of co-workers, peers of mine, so they are fairly well-educated people. Fairly well-educated people. I stress that, because, just as you have no idea who really lives in the house next to you, you never really know the person in the cube next to yours… that is, until you go to lunch and the subject of politics comes up.

Politics! Why that’s one of those things we’re never to discuss in polite society, isn’t it? Hmmm. We’re sitting there – at a little dive known for their chicken wings and live music (hair metal) (they picked it) – waiting for our food when the woman across from me mentions that Michele Bachmann is ahead in the polls in Iowa! Because I’m not expecting anyone to bring up politics, it catches me totally off guard and a conversation about politics is off and running (for President!). The woman next to her is excited to hear this news. Turns out that her husband, a state trooper, is a big fan Ms. Bachmann’s and the pair plan on voting for her in 2012. This conversation goes on for about 45 minutes. The discussion includes abortion, the Mormon religion, Michele Bachmann and Obama. Seated at the table we have one diehard republican, one liberal conservative who just does not like Obama, and me.

My first impulse is to dive in and challenge everything that they believe. But I resist. First off, I am woefully unprepared for this type of debate. Michele Bachmann in such a ridiculous character that I really never thought I would come face to face with someone who actually takes her seriously. My bad. I have an opportunity to inform, but I lack the basic information to do it. Secondly, since I can’t educate, I decide to remain as neutral as possible in order to gather information. I want to know what these people think – what makes them tick. I want to know just what it is about Michele Bachmann that would lead one to believe that she is intelligent enough, experienced enough, and skilled enough to be President of the United States.

Turns out it’s because they think she’s sexy. They think it would be fun to see her stand in front of the nation and flip her hair. They just like her. Period.

I want to point out the fact that her husband – who is probably gay – runs one of those horrible gay-reversal therapy clinics (which is state and federally funded!). I want to point out the fact that Michele believes in creationism and believes that it is the only thing that should be taught in our public schools. I want to point out the she doesn’t believe in science, evolution, or global warming. She believes that if we teach America’s children anything about gay history that the school system is therefore encouraging students to ‘try it out’.

Seriously – her belief system makes Scientology and Mormonism seem positively logical by comparison.

Do I have a duty as a gay dude to educate these two women? Yes? Okay, maybe I was just being lazy, but I decided, no. I didn’t agree with them, but I did try to get them to see that belief systems are a very personal thing – and while everyone has a right to believe whatever they wish - not everyone should be President.

I tried to point out the difficulties the Obama administration faced upon taking office and that he inherited a lot of unresolved issues. It didn’t matter. Obama was deemed ineffective. They don’t want him to see another term. Why? They don’t like him. Well, I point out, I didn’t either – if I had my way Hillary Clinton would be President. One of them agrees. But then they think a woman President would also be ineffective because she would have to deal with countries where women are considered less than a man. I point out, that as secretary of state, she’s having to do that now. The fact that Michele Bachmann is also a woman seems to escape this person, and I decided to cut my losses.

But the whole “women as less than a man” somehow morphs into the issue of abortion. One of the women doesn’t feel that abortion should ever be allowed – not even in cases of rape. I explain that I believe that a woman has the right to do with her body whatever she wishes – including not getting an abortion, if she so chooses. Again – abortion – a very individual, personal thing – something everyone should get to make a decision about for themselves. If this woman was raped and decided to keep the baby, provided that she planned on raising and providing for the child herself and was sure she could love the child despite the circumstances of its conception, then I fully support her decision. Because that would be what she chose for herself. On the other hand, if someone was raped and became pregnant after being raped and decided that an abortion is what she needed to do for herself, I would support that decision, too. The whole concept of the right of individuals to choose for themselves seems to be a concept lost on most conservatives, right? No.

Republicans amaze me – they believe that the government should not be allowed to tell people what to do – except when it comes to abortion and gay rights.

Democrats amaze me, too – they seem to think the government should be involved in everything. If a social issue exists – just keep throwing money at it.

I lay my cards on the table. I believe in the rights of the individual. I believe people may believe and behave in anyway the see fit as long as it not physically or psychologically harmful to others. I think smaller government is a good idea. I think government is too involved in trying to solve social issues – something that their track record would seem to indicate that they are no good at – and not taking care of the basics – keeping people safe, keeping people from taking advantage of other people, and keeping the economy on track.

Unfortunately, we live in a country where there exists a two-party system. So each year, I go to the polls and end up having to choose the lesser of two evils. And in 2012, something tells me that I will be voting for a democrat, again – because if you look at those vying for the republican nomination – there ain’t nothing but evil.

Michele Bachmann is a dangerous woman. Why? It stems from her twisted, evangelical belief system. Michele operates from her own Biblical World View: which basically means she can say that anything that doesn’t fit with her ideology is the product of mistaken theological premises. In other words, if it contradicts what she believes, it must be false.

Michele Bachmann is the face of anti-gay politics.

“Any of you who have members of your family that are in the lifestyle—we have a member of our family that is. This is not funny. It’s a very sad life. It’s part of Satan, I think, to say this is gay. It’s anything but gay.” – Michele Bachmann, referring to her lesbian step-sister – or maybe her husband, it is hard to tell

“Little children will be forced to learn that homosexuality is normal and natural and perhaps they should try it.” – Michele Bachmann on why gay history should not be taught in our schools

"Barbarians need to be educated. They need to be disciplined, and just because someone feels this or thinks this, doesn't mean that we're supposed to go down that road." – Marcus Bachmann, Michele’s gay husband, on what to do about gay people

I could go on and on. Michele Bachmann certainly does. And hard facts do not get in the way of what she believes. All you need to do is google Michele Bachmann and all sorts of nonsense will appear. Click away. It would all be mildly amusing, if it wasn’t so dangerous. And hateful. And twisted. And wrong.

Now I have a decision to make? What to do about these two women at work? De-friend them? Break down the walls of their cubes and seize their desks? Go all PC educator on their asses? Start sending them news articles pointing out the folly of evangelical politicians?

I don’t know. And part of me doesn’t care. These women can believe what they want to believe. That’s their right. I’m not sure pointing out what is illogical, what flies in the face of science, what the actual facts are, or what is just downright mean-spirited, contradictory, hypocritical and petty would have any effect on their belief systems.

Ignorance isn’t bliss, it’s a cancer. And I’m no doctor.

When I look at the United States and hear of some the legislation that is proposed and the values that legislation is said to represent – I find it chilling, but more – I am simply amazed that such ideologies still exist. I used to think that such ignorance only thrived in states like Alabama, Georgia, and Mississippi. But it’s really much closer than any of us would care to believe.

In fact, it could be as close as the cube right next to yours.

Yes, like objects in the mirror, ignorance is much closer than you think.