Wonderland Burlesque's
Let's All Go To The Movies
Hollywood, Behind The Camera
Part 3 of 3
Hey! Let's not forget about the writers.
For what is a film without a story?
Yes, while spinning tales, one is bound to create a story or two of their own - as in some very real drama behind the scenes.
Today's Let's Go To The Movies edition takes a final look at the fictionalized accounts of some very real movers and shakers in the industry - which, of course, makes for the juiciest of gossip.
So, let's dig in and take a look at the making of these films about Hollywood's elite, the screenwriters!
--- ---
Merrily We Go To Hell
(1932)
Richard 'Skeets' Gallagher was a last minute replacement for Jack Oakie.
The word 'Hell' could not be used as part of the title in the UK. Instead, it was simply retitled Merrily We Go to ____. According to a contemporary article in Variety, the Los Angeles Times also refused to print the title of the film in its advertisements. However, they did print the title in its review of the picture.
Mordaunt Hall, film critic for The New York Times, gave the film a mixed review upon its release. Hall believed the film was wildly funny in stretches, and described the acting by the two leads as "excellent", but believed the scenes in which March's character was intoxicated went nowhere, and that the script was lacking. However, despite similar reviews, which often noted that it had been directed by a woman, the film was one of the most financially successful films that year.
--- ---
The Way We Were
(1973)
During post-WWII McCarthyism, a diametrically opposed couple come together only to find out that genuine friendship and physical attraction are not enough to overcome fundamental societal beliefs. Set in the period from the mid-1930s to the 1950s, this is a love story involving two markedly different people; Katie is an idealistic, uptight, Stalin-loving political activist, while Hubbell is an easy-going, athletic, All American-type, who also happens to be a talented writer. Their divergent personalities and the times they live in end up negatively affecting their relationship, proving sometimes love does not conquer all.
Peter Bogdanovich was offered the opportunity to direct, but turned it down, a decision he later regretted.
Warren Beatty was originally offered the role of Hubbell Gardiner.
When Robert Redford procrastinated about taking the role of Hubbell Gardner, producer Ray Stark approached Ryan O'Neal.
Pollack assured producer Ray Stark that he could deliver Robert Redford for the role of Hubbell, which Laurents had written with Ryan O'Neal in mind. O'Neal's affair with Streisand was on the rocks, and Stark wanted to avoid conflicts between the leads.
Pollack assured producer Ray Stark that he could deliver Robert Redford for the role of Hubbell, which Laurents had written with Ryan O'Neal in mind. O'Neal's affair with Streisand was on the rocks, and Stark wanted to avoid conflicts between the leads.
A gay man, screenwriter Arthur Laurents based the film's plot on his own tempestuous love affair with bisexual film actor Farley Granger whom he met in 1948. Their personality differences were immense: Laurents was Jewish and a political activist, while Granger was a carefree White Anglo-Saxon Protestant. Much of the dialogue and plot developments are based on fact, including the initial seduction scene and the deterioration of the relationship due to Granger's inability to defend Laurents when he testified before the House Un-American Activities Committee. Ultimately, Laurents was blacklisted on the grounds that a review of his 1945 play Home of the Brave had been published in The Daily Worker.
This film was one of the first Hollywood productions to tackle explicitly the blacklisting of actors and writers during the McCarthy era which had profound repercussions for the Hollywood community in the late 1940s and early 1950s. Laurents was blacklisted in 1951 while in Europe with Farley Granger. The United States State Department therefore declined to renew his passport for several years
During filming, Laurents was often frustrated by director Sydney Pollack's alterations to his screenplay. Laurents fought to keep certain lines and scenes in the film which Pollack wanted to change or to cut. Streisand remained Laurents's staunchest ally throughout filming.
Sydney Pollack defended his changes to Arthur Laurents' script, arguing that Laurents was unable to see past his political message to make the best choices for drama, and that in Laurents' original script Hubbell was merely a one-dimensional straw man to Katie, a thankless role Robert Redford was reluctant to play. Pollack claimed that the two leads needed to be equally matched.
The segment dealing with the McCarthy witch hunts was the most severely affected by Pollack's ill-advised cuts. It originally took up much more screen time. When the segment was cut to the bone, the chief victims of the cuts were Viveca Lindfors and Murray Hamilton whose roles were rendered little more than brief bit parts.
Redford was unhappy with cuts made to the film following a preview. He said, "I think we'd both have preferred a more political Dalton Trumbo-type script, but finally Sydney came down on the side of the love story. He said, 'This is first and foremost a love affair,' and we conceded that. We trusted his instincts, and he was right."
Streisand was upset about the scenes being cut. She explained in a 1999 interview, "There weren't many movies made about this period of time in the blacklist, and that's why it killed me to have those two scenes taken out. I was really heartbroken."
Arthur Laurents summed up his experience on the film, "To make a mantra of 'it's only a movie' was as useless and foolish as feeling pain. No matter what I felt or thought, no matter what I tried to accomplish or how, Sydney Pollack would ultimately have his way. That was what I had to face and accept. They didn't cry 'Author! Author!' in the movies, they never had. Now they cried 'Auteur! Auteur!' - even if the auteur fucked up the picture."
Laurents actually wrote a sequel to this film. Redford read it and never got back to him. When Streisand happened to come across it in a pile of scripts, she was on board, but ultimately declined because she didn't wish to work with producer Ray Stark again.
When she heard the titular song for the first time, she loved it. However, she made two important suggestions which ended up transforming the song into something even better. She suggested a slight shift in the melody to send it soaring at a crucial point in the song, and she also suggested changing the first line of the song from "Daydreams light the corners of my mind" to "Memories light the corners of my mind."
In an interview before a live audience at the Brooklyn Academy of Music in 2012, Redford candidly admitted that one of the factors that led to the convincing romantic tension between Katie and Hubbell was the fact that Streisand developed an off-screen crush on him as filming progressed. While he didn't return her feelings, he recognized that she was giving a magnificent performance and he was determined not to allow anything to get in the way of that. Ultimately, he decided the kindest course of action was to simply pretend that he didn't notice her crush on him.
Redford said in an interview that, when he was asked what Barbra Streisand was wearing in bed the first time they made love, he replied "only Chanel No. 5"
--- ---
Tribute
(1980)
A shallow Broadway press agent learns he is dying just as his estranged son by his ex-wife arrives for a visit.
Adapted by Bernard Slade from his play of the same name, this Canadian comedy-drama was directed by Bob Clark and stars Jack Lemmon Robby Benson, Lee Remick, Colleen Dewhurst, John Marley, Kim Cattrall, and Gale Garnett.
Playwright Bernard Slade wrote the lead character especially for Jack Lemmon.
The film was inspired by the life of talent agent Harvey Orkin.
Arthur Hiller was, at one point, in consideration to direct this film.
Jack Lemmon was nominated for the 1979 Tony Award for Actor in a Drama for his work in the Broadway stage show. He then recreated his role in this movie.
The film was entered into competition at the 31st Berlin International Film Festival in 1981 where Lemmon was awarded the prestigious Silver Bear for Best Actor. He also won the Canadian Genie Award for Best Performance by a Foreign Actor. In addition, Lemmon was nominated for Best Actor at the 1981 Academy Awards, as well as a Golden Globe.
An accomplished, self-taught pianist, Jack Lemmon wrote the musical theme for the movie.
This served as Kim Cattrall's debut on the big screen.
--- ---
I Ought To Be In Pictures
(1982)
--- ---
Irreconcilable Differences
(1984)
Loosely based on the marriage and divorce of director Peter Bogdanovich and producer Polly Platt. Sharon Stone's character is modeled upon Cybill Shepherd, a former lover of Peter Bogdanovich.
The expensive flop musical that the Ryan O'Neal's character makes as a vehicle for Sharon Stone's character is a thinly veiled reference to At Long Last Love (1975), the expensive flop musical which Peter Bogdanovich made as a vehicle for Cybill Shepherd.
When Bogdanovich's directorial career faltered, Platt became the successful producer of such hit films as Broadcast News, Say Anything and War of the Roses after having worked as a production assistant on Terms of Endearment.
Bogdanovich has said in interviews that this movie is "terrible", as it portrays him and Cybill Shepherd as the villains and presents Platt as the victim in a very one-sided manner.
The cowriters of this movie, Nancy Meyers and Charles Shyer were, at the time of filming, like the main characters - a married couple who collaborated on movies. That is until they divorced in 1999.
Rumored to be at the crux of all the disagreements? Shelley Long's perfectionistic acting method acting, which proved oppressive, divisive and intrusive.
Ryan O'Neal took the role for no salary, just points, because he really wanted to do it, but they didn't have the money to pay the actors what they usually earned. He said he loved the movie and thinks it's some of his best work. "I love the movie," said Ryan O'Neal. "So I did it for no salary, just points. It was made for under $6 million, so they didn't have the money to pay us. Still, I think it's some of my best work. Maybe I should work like that more often."
The film was a minor hit and was well-received by the critics, who really liked the screenplay.
3 comments:
wow, also in Italian: come eravamo!
The only one I wasn't familiar with was "Merrily..."
I directed a production of "I Ought..." - the film script was much better than Simon's stage play. The play reads well, but up on its feet doesn't quite make it.
OMG
Redford and Streisand? Yes, please! This is also the only of these movies I've watched. I think Ryan O'neal and Robert Redford are absolutely handsome. Magnetic, riveting and fascinating, even though both were typecasted because of their looks.
I love these posts, Upton.
XOXO
Post a Comment